You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparative outcomes between all-inside arthroscopic suture anchor technique versus arthroscopic transosseous suture technique in patients with triangular fibrocartilage complex tear: a retrospective comparative study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, October 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13018-021-02752-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chia-Hung Hung, Yu-Feng Kuo, Yu-Jen Chen, Ping-Chun Yeh, Hsiao-Yun Cho, Yeong-Jang Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 25% |
Student > Master | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 1 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 25% |
Engineering | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2021.
All research outputs
#15,686,478
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#676
of 1,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,314
of 434,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#13
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,428 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.