You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evidence of the impacts of pharmaceuticals on aquatic animal behaviour: a systematic map protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-021-00241-z |
| Authors |
Jake M. Martin, Michael G. Bertram, Paul J. Blanchfield, Jack A. Brand, Tomas Brodin, Bryan W. Brooks, Daniel Cerveny, Malgorzata Lagisz, Isaac Y. Ligocki, Marcus Michelangeli, Shinichi Nakagawa, Jack T. Orford, Josefin Sundin, Hung Tan, Bob B. M. Wong, Erin S. McCallum |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 8 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 15% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Poland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 48% |
| Scientists | 15 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2023.
All research outputs
#814,854
of 24,406,441 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#25
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,474
of 431,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,406,441 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.