↓ Skip to main content

Evidence of the impacts of pharmaceuticals on aquatic animal behaviour: a systematic map protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 327)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
31 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence of the impacts of pharmaceuticals on aquatic animal behaviour: a systematic map protocol
Published in
Environmental Evidence, October 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13750-021-00241-z
Authors

Jake M. Martin, Michael G. Bertram, Paul J. Blanchfield, Jack A. Brand, Tomas Brodin, Bryan W. Brooks, Daniel Cerveny, Malgorzata Lagisz, Isaac Y. Ligocki, Marcus Michelangeli, Shinichi Nakagawa, Jack T. Orford, Josefin Sundin, Hung Tan, Bob B. M. Wong, Erin S. McCallum

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 19 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 13%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 22 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2023.
All research outputs
#867,505
of 25,085,910 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#25
of 327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,336
of 434,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,085,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.