You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How to navigate the application of ethics norms in global health research: reflections based on qualitative research conducted with people with disabilities in Uganda
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-021-00710-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Muriel Mac-Seing, Louise Ringuette, Kate Zinszer, Béatrice Godard, Christina Zarowsky |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 8 | 67% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Researcher | 1 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 62% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 10% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2021.
All research outputs
#5,129,535
of 25,072,471 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#504
of 1,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,676
of 434,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#16
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,072,471 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,085 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.