You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Public health preparedness and response synergies between institutional authorities and the community: a qualitative case study of emerging tick-borne diseases in Spain and the Netherlands
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-021-11925-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel H. de Vries, John Kinsman, Anne Lia Cremers, John Angrén, Massimo Ciotti, Svetla Tsolova, Emma Wiltshire, Judit Takacs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 19 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 4 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2021.
All research outputs
#13,166,490
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,105
of 15,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,672
of 439,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#220
of 403 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 403 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.