↓ Skip to main content

Do continuous forms of intra-operative ultrafiltration enhance recovery after adult cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass? A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized…

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do continuous forms of intra-operative ultrafiltration enhance recovery after adult cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass? A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Published in
Systematic Reviews, October 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13643-021-01826-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joel Bierer, David Horne, Roger Stanzel, Mark Henderson, Leah Boulos, Jill Hayden

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 9%
Lecturer 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 11 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Engineering 2 9%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2021.
All research outputs
#5,896,555
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#996
of 2,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,832
of 434,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#37
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.