↓ Skip to main content

Integrated complex care coordination for children with medical complexity: A mixed-methods evaluation of tertiary care-community collaboration

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
264 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integrated complex care coordination for children with medical complexity: A mixed-methods evaluation of tertiary care-community collaboration
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-366
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eyal Cohen, Ashley Lacombe-Duncan, Karen Spalding, Jennifer MacInnis, David Nicholas, Unni G Narayanan, Michelle Gordon, Ivor Margolis, Jeremy N Friedman

Abstract

Primary care medical homes may improve health outcomes for children with special healthcare needs (CSHCN), by improving care coordination. However, community-based primary care practices may be challenged to deliver comprehensive care coordination to complex subsets of CSHCN such as children with medical complexity (CMC). Linking a tertiary care center with the community may achieve cost effective and high quality care for CMC. The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of community-based complex care clinics integrated with a tertiary care center.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 1%
United States 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 259 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 11%
Student > Master 28 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 10%
Other 25 9%
Other 70 27%
Unknown 57 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 13%
Social Sciences 23 9%
Psychology 16 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Other 33 13%
Unknown 67 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,589,305
of 23,548,905 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#543
of 7,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,440
of 185,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#6
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,548,905 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,841 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.