↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED ARTICLE: High bioavailablilty iron maize (Zea mays L.) developed through molecular breeding provides more absorbable iron in vitro (Caco-2 model) and in vivo (Gallus gallus)

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RETRACTED ARTICLE: High bioavailablilty iron maize (Zea mays L.) developed through molecular breeding provides more absorbable iron in vitro (Caco-2 model) and in vivo (Gallus gallus)
Published in
Nutrition Journal, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-12-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elad Tako, Owen A Hoekenga, Leon V Kochian, Raymond P Glahn

Abstract

Iron (Fe) deficiency is the most common micronutrient deficiency worldwide. Iron biofortification is a preventative strategy that alleviates Fe deficiency by improving the amount of absorbable Fe in crops. In the present study, we used an in vitro digestion/Caco 2 cell culture model as the guiding tool for breeding and development of two maize (Zea mays L.) lines with contrasting Fe bioavailability (ie. Low and High). Our objective was to confirm and validate the in vitro results and approach. Also, to compare the capacities of our two maize hybrid varieties to deliver Fe for hemoglobin (Hb) synthesis and to improve the Fe status of Fe deficient broiler chickens.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
France 1 1%
Nigeria 1 1%
Unknown 75 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 18 23%