↓ Skip to main content

Exploring the relationship between static fishing gear, fishing effort, and benthic biodiversity: a systematic review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
31 X users

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring the relationship between static fishing gear, fishing effort, and benthic biodiversity: a systematic review protocol
Published in
Environmental Evidence, October 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13750-021-00242-y
Authors

Hannah Fennell, Marija Sciberras, Jan Geert Hiddink, Michel J. Kaiser, Eric Gilman, David Donnan, Rory Crawford

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 14 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 23%
Environmental Science 3 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Unknown 15 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,625,171
of 24,943,708 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#62
of 324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,082
of 433,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,943,708 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.