↓ Skip to main content

Exploring condom use decision-making among adolescents: the synergistic role of affective and rational processes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring condom use decision-making among adolescents: the synergistic role of affective and rational processes
Published in
BMC Public Health, October 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12889-021-11926-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eugene L. Davids, Yanga Zembe, Petrus J. de Vries, Catherine Mathews, Alison Swartz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Master 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Researcher 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 51 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Chemistry 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 51 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2021.
All research outputs
#18,818,439
of 23,321,213 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#13,142
of 15,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#315,336
of 439,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#329
of 401 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,321,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 401 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.