You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community setting: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-021-01817-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susan M. Smith, Emma Wallace, Barbara Clyne, Fiona Boland, Martin Fortin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 11 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 25% |
| Canada | 3 | 8% |
| Denmark | 3 | 8% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 19 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 14 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 243 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 11% |
| Researcher | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 45 | 18% |
| Unknown | 84 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 5% |
| Psychology | 8 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 30 | 12% |
| Unknown | 92 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,219,948
of 25,262,379 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#169
of 2,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,034
of 435,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#3
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,262,379 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.