↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of the efficacy of memantine in the treatment of fibromyalgia: study protocol for a doubled-blind randomized controlled trial with six-month follow-up

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of the efficacy of memantine in the treatment of fibromyalgia: study protocol for a doubled-blind randomized controlled trial with six-month follow-up
Published in
Trials, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-14-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bárbara Olivan-Blázquez, Marta Puebla, Bárbara Masluk, Mari-Cruz Pérez-Yus, Raquel Arcega, Eva Andrés, Yolanda López-del-Hoyo, Rosa Magallon, Miquel Roca, Javier Garcia-Campayo

Abstract

Fibromyalgia is a prevalent chronic rheumatic disease of great clinical importance. Recent studies have found raised levels of glutamate in the insula, hippocampus and posterior cingulate cortex regions of the brains of fibromyalgia (FM) patients. This finding has led researchers to speculate about the usefulness of glutamate-blocking drugs such as memantine in the treatment of fibromyalgia. The hypothesis of this study is that the administration of memantine will reduce the glutamate levels, and futhermore, will decrease the perceived pain. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of memantine in the treatment of pain (pain perception). A secondary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of memantine in the treatment of other clinical symptoms of FM, and to evaluate the efficacy of memantine in reducing brain levels of glutamate, and its effects on the central nervous system as a whole.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 123 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Postgraduate 11 9%
Other 8 6%
Other 33 26%
Unknown 21 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 29%
Psychology 21 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Neuroscience 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 31 24%