You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Insecticide-treated eave ribbons for malaria vector control in low-income communities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-021-03945-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emmanuel W. Kaindoa, Arnold S. Mmbando, Ruth Shirima, Emmanuel E. Hape, Fredros O. Okumu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 4 | 19% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Kenya | 2 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 62% |
| Scientists | 7 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 8% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 5 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 24 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,430,042
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#510
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,969
of 431,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#10
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.