You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Optimized microbial DNA extraction from diarrheic stools
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Research Notes, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-5-702 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Emilie Donatin, Michel Drancourt |
Abstract |
The detection of enteropathogens in stool specimens increasingly relies on the detection of specific nucleic acid sequences. We observed that such detection was hampered in diarrheic stool specimens and we set-up an improved protocol combining lyophilization of stools prior to a semi-automated DNA extraction. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 5% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 40 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 23% |
Student > Master | 10 | 23% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Unknown | 3 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 40% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 23% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 4 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2013.
All research outputs
#19,292,491
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#3,067
of 4,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,450
of 285,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#33
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.