You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Definitions and methods of measuring and reporting on injurious falls in randomised controlled fall prevention trials: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-12-50 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Schwenk, Andreas Lauenroth, Christian Stock, Raquel Rodriguez Moreno, Peter Oster, Gretl McHugh, Chris Todd, Klaus Hauer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 144 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 16% |
| Researcher | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 23% |
| Unknown | 21 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 15% |
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 6% |
| Engineering | 8 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 18% |
| Unknown | 28 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2020.
All research outputs
#8,158,001
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,210
of 2,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,274
of 176,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#5
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.