↓ Skip to main content

Decision support for hospital bed management using adaptable individual length of stay estimations and shared resources

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Decision support for hospital bed management using adaptable individual length of stay estimations and shared resources
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-13-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Schmidt, Sandra Geisler, Cord Spreckelsen

Abstract

Elective patient admission and assignment planning is an important task of the strategic and operational management of a hospital and early on became a central topic of clinical operations research. The management of hospital beds is an important subtask. Various approaches have been proposed, involving the computation of efficient assignments with regard to the patients' condition, the necessity of the treatment, and the patients' preferences. However, these approaches are mostly based on static, unadaptable estimates of the length of stay and, thus, do not take into account the uncertainty of the patient's recovery. Furthermore, the effect of aggregated bed capacities have not been investigated in this context. Computer supported bed management, combining an adaptable length of stay estimation with the treatment of shared resources (aggregated bed capacities) has not yet been sufficiently investigated. The aim of our work is: 1) to define a cost function for patient admission taking into account adaptable length of stay estimations and aggregated resources, 2) to define a mathematical program formally modeling the assignment problem and an architecture for decision support, 3) to investigate four algorithmic methodologies addressing the assignment problem and one base-line approach, and 4) to evaluate these methodologies w.r.t. cost outcome, performance, and dismissal ratio.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 204 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 23%
Student > Master 33 16%
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Researcher 19 9%
Other 12 6%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 40 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 18%
Engineering 24 12%
Computer Science 23 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 17 8%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 52 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,941,336
of 23,702,491 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#455
of 2,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,333
of 286,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#15
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,702,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,025 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.