↓ Skip to main content

A diverse array of genetic factors contribute to the pathogenesis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A diverse array of genetic factors contribute to the pathogenesis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1750-1172-8-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicki Tiffin, Adebowale Adeyemo, Ikechi Okpechi

Abstract

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease with variable clinical presentation frequently affecting the skin, joints, haemopoietic system, kidneys, lungs and central nervous system. It can be life threatening when major organs are involved. The full pathological and genetic mechanisms of this complex disease are yet to be elucidated; although roles have been described for environmental triggers such as sunlight, drugs and chemicals, and infectious agents. Cellular processes such as inefficient clearing of apoptotic DNA fragments and generation of autoantibodies have been implicated in disease progression. A diverse array of disease-associated genes and microRNA regulatory molecules that are dysregulated through polymorphism and copy number variation have also been identified; and an effect of ethnicity on susceptibility has been described.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 120 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 23%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 26 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Chemistry 3 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 26 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2022.
All research outputs
#5,456,855
of 25,408,670 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#773
of 3,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,975
of 289,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#14
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,408,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.