You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A comparison of two assessment tools used in overviews of systematic reviews: ROBIS versus AMSTAR-2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-021-01819-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. Perry, A. Whitmarsh, V. Leach, P. Davies |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 24% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 76% |
| Scientists | 2 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 19% |
| Unknown | 27 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 28 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,106,725
of 25,362,919 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#340
of 2,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,973
of 441,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#6
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,362,919 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,228 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.