You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Economic benefits of methylmercury exposure control in Europe: Monetary value of neurotoxicity prevention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Health, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1476-069x-12-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martine Bellanger, Céline Pichery, Dominique Aerts, Marika Berglund, Argelia Castaño, Mája Čejchanová, Pierre Crettaz, Fred Davidson, Marta Esteban, Marc E Fischer, Anca Elena Gurzau, Katarina Halzlova, Andromachi Katsonouri, Lisbeth E Knudsen, Marike Kolossa-Gehring, Gudrun Koppen, Danuta Ligocka, Ana Miklavčič, M ccccFátima Reis, Peter Rudnai, Janja Snoj Tratnik, Pál Weihe, Esben Budtz-Jørgensen, Philippe Grandjean, DEMO/COPHES |
| Abstract |
Due to global mercury pollution and the adverse health effects of prenatal exposure to methylmercury (MeHg), an assessment of the economic benefits of prevented developmental neurotoxicity is necessary for any cost-benefit analysis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| Canada | 2 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| Maldives | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 83% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 198 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 48 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 36 | 17% |
| Unknown | 31 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 18% |
| Environmental Science | 31 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 49 | 24% |
| Unknown | 51 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 119. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2023.
All research outputs
#355,440
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#104
of 1,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,362
of 290,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.