You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How should we evaluate sweetened beverage tax policies? A review of worldwide experience
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-021-11984-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shu Wen Ng, M. Arantxa Colchero, Martin White |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 18% |
| Australia | 8 | 11% |
| United States | 8 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 7% |
| Chile | 2 | 3% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 28 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 44% |
| Scientists | 26 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 48 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 51 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#689,995
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#694
of 17,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,427
of 445,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#22
of 411 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 411 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.