You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Construct validity of the psychological general well being index (PGWBI) in a sample of patients undergoing treatment for stress-related exhaustion: a rasch analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-11-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Åsa Lundgren-Nilsson, Ingibjörg H Jonsdottir, Gunnar Ahlborg, Alan Tennant |
| Abstract |
The Psychological General Well Being Index (PGWBI) is a widely used scale across many conditions. Over time issues have been raised about the dimensional structure of the scale, and it has not yet been subjected to scrutiny by modern Psychometric approaches. The current study thus evaluates the PGWBI with Rasch- and factor analysis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 11% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 25 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 23 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 29 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2013.
All research outputs
#18,325,190
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,665
of 2,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,731
of 281,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#82
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.