You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Association of four gene polymorphisms in Chinese Guangxi population with diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetic patients
BMC Ophthalmology, October 2021
He Jin, Dongdong Jiang, Zhixiang Ding, Yu Xiong, Xinsheng Zeng, Miaoyun Liao, Liu Zheng, Binbin Yang
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||50%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||50%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||2||14%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||1||7%|
|Student > Master||1||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||4||29%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||1||7%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2021.
All research outputs
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ophthalmology
of 2,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 440,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ophthalmology
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,455 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.