You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mediation analysis methods used in observational research: a scoping review and recommendations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-021-01426-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Judith J. M. Rijnhart, Sophia J. Lamp, Matthew J. Valente, David P. MacKinnon, Jos W. R. Twisk, Martijn W. Heymans |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 231 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 16% |
| Researcher | 31 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 44 | 19% |
| Unknown | 72 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 5% |
| Psychology | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 62 | 27% |
| Unknown | 80 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2021.
All research outputs
#15,941,515
of 25,231,854 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,547
of 2,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,629
of 434,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#48
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,231,854 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.