↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Potential markers for sample size estimations in hereditary spastic paraplegia type 5

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction to: Potential markers for sample size estimations in hereditary spastic paraplegia type 5
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, October 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13023-021-02078-8
Authors

Qianqian Lin, Ying Liu, Zhixian Ye, Jianping Hu, Wenjie Cai, Qiang Weng, Wan-Jin Chen, Ning Wang, Dairong Cao, Yi Lin, Ying Fu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2021.
All research outputs
#16,930,930
of 20,991,427 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,923
of 2,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#303,571
of 421,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#268
of 376 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,991,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,346 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 376 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.