You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Ocular adverse events from pharmacological treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis—A systematic review of the literature
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, October 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13643-021-01782-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Juliana Muñoz-Ortiz, Juliana Reyes-Guanes, Estefanía Zapata-Bravo, Laura Mora-Muñoz, Juan Antonio Reyes-Hurtado, Luis Octavio Tierradentro-García, William Rojas-Carabali, Marcela Gómez-Suarez, Alejandra de-la-Torre |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 11% |
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 18 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 19% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 11% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 18 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,291,863
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#892
of 2,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,532
of 440,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#34
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.