You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An ethnobotanical survey of wild edible plants used by the Yi people of Liangshan Prefecture, Sichuan Province, China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13002-019-0349-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jing Wang, Barnabas C. Seyler, Tamara Ticktin, Yonggang Zeng, Kede Ayu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 48 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 55 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2021.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#362
of 793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,460
of 385,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.