↓ Skip to main content

Developing best practices for PPE Portraits across 25 sites: a systematic assessment of implementation and spread of adaptations using FRAME

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developing best practices for PPE Portraits across 25 sites: a systematic assessment of implementation and spread of adaptations using FRAME
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, October 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12913-021-06922-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juliana Baratta, Alexis Amano, Paige K Parsons, Stacie Vilendrer, Shira G. Winter, Mae-Richelle Verano, Cynthia Perez, Lucy Kalanithi, Steven M Asch, Mary Beth Heffernan, Cati Brown-Johnson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 18 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 17 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2021.
All research outputs
#16,040,108
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,797
of 7,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,098
of 441,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#157
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,915 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.