You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of Optimised MDI versus Pumps with or without Sensors in Severe Hypoglycaemia (the Hypo COMPaSS trial)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Endocrine Disorders, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6823-12-33 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stuart Little, Thomas Chadwick, Pratik Choudhary, Cath Brennand, Julia Stickland, Shalleen Barendse, Tolulope Olateju, Lalantha Leelarathna, Emma Walkinshaw, Horng K Tan, Sally M Marshall, Reena M Thomas, Simon Heller, Mark Evans, David Kerr, Daniel Flanagan, Jane Speight, James AM Shaw |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 61 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 13 | 21% |
| Unknown | 10 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 11% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Design | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 11 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2013.
All research outputs
#15,260,208
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from BMC Endocrine Disorders
#394
of 740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,040
of 278,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Endocrine Disorders
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 740 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.