You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Association of baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio with response to nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biomarker Research, November 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40364-021-00334-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Matthew D. Tucker, Landon C. Brown, Yu-Wei Chen, Chester Kao, Nathan Hirshman, Emily N. Kinsey, Kristin K. Ancell, Kathryn E. Beckermann, Nancy B. Davis, Renee McAlister, Kerry Schaffer, Andrew J. Armstrong, Michael R. Harrison, Daniel J. George, W. Kimryn Rathmell, Brian I. Rini, Tian Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 75% |
Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
Scientists | 3 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 20% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 27% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 13% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,041,103
of 24,769,082 outputs
Outputs from Biomarker Research
#57
of 368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,132
of 434,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomarker Research
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,769,082 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.