↓ Skip to main content

Commentary: What should referral pathways have to improve healthcare experiences of women with female genital mutilation in Australia?

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Health, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Commentary: What should referral pathways have to improve healthcare experiences of women with female genital mutilation in Australia?
Published in
Reproductive Health, November 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12978-021-01274-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolyne Njue, Edward K. Ameyaw, Bright O. Ahinkorah, Abdul-Aziz Seidu, Samuel Kimani

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Librarian 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 19 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 19 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,555,549
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#828
of 1,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,031
of 439,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#16
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.