You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The impact of COVID-19 critical illness on new disability, functional outcomes and return to work at 6 months: a prospective cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-021-03794-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carol L. Hodgson, Alisa M. Higgins, Michael J. Bailey, Anne M. Mather, Lisa Beach, Rinaldo Bellomo, Bernie Bissett, Ianthe J. Boden, Scott Bradley, Aidan Burrell, D. James Cooper, Bentley J. Fulcher, Kimberley J. Haines, Jack Hopkins, Alice Y. M. Jones, Stuart Lane, Drew Lawrence, Lisa van der Lee, Jennifer Liacos, Natalie J. Linke, Lonni Marques Gomes, Marc Nickels, George Ntoumenopoulos, Paul S. Myles, Shane Patman, Michelle Paton, Gemma Pound, Sumeet Rai, Alana Rix, Thomas C. Rollinson, Janani Sivasuthan, Claire J. Tipping, Peter Thomas, Tony Trapani, Andrew A. Udy, Christina Whitehead, Isabelle T. Hodgson, Shannah Anderson, Ary Serpa Neto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 560 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 72 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 36 | 6% |
| United States | 29 | 5% |
| Canada | 21 | 4% |
| Finland | 17 | 3% |
| France | 12 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 10 | 2% |
| Germany | 9 | 2% |
| Spain | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 62 | 11% |
| Unknown | 283 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 463 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 46 | 8% |
| Scientists | 38 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 13 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 132 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 13% |
| Researcher | 15 | 11% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 16% |
| Unknown | 48 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 4% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 54 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 345. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2023.
All research outputs
#96,859
of 25,826,146 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#33
of 6,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,668
of 445,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#3
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,826,146 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.