↓ Skip to main content

Comparative analysis of follicle morphology and oocyte diameter in four mammalian species (mouse, hamster, pig, and human)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental & Clinical Assisted Reproduction, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
171 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative analysis of follicle morphology and oocyte diameter in four mammalian species (mouse, hamster, pig, and human)
Published in
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Assisted Reproduction, March 2006
DOI 10.1186/1743-1050-3-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeanine Griffin, Benjamin R Emery, Ivan Huang, C Matthew Peterson, Douglas T Carrell

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Zimbabwe 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 208 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 25%
Student > Bachelor 26 12%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Master 24 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 37 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 46 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 12 6%
Engineering 7 3%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 47 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,023,999
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Assisted Reproduction
#2
of 6 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,665
of 72,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Assisted Reproduction
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them