You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Role of 12 lead ECG Q-waves as a marker of myocardial infarction in the era of cardiac magnetic resonance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-18-s1-p239 |
| Authors |
Amardeep Ghosh Dastidar, Alexander Carpenter, Jonathan C Rodrigues, Catherine R Wilson, Samantha R Kestenbaum, Anna Baritussio, Alberto Palazzuoli, Angus K Nightingale, Andreas Baumbach, Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 33% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 33% |
| Researcher | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 50% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 17% |
| Engineering | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2021.
All research outputs
#3,777,877
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#220
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,185
of 407,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#9
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.