↓ Skip to main content

Utility of modified Faine’s criteria in diagnosis of leptospirosis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Utility of modified Faine’s criteria in diagnosis of leptospirosis
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12879-016-1791-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kanchana Bandara, Manjula Manoji Weerasekera, Chinthika Gunasekara, Nilantha Ranasinghe, Chamil Marasinghe, Neluka Fernando

Abstract

Leptospirosis is a globally emerging zoonotic disease and an important public health threat in developing countries. Diagnosis of leptospirosis is mainly based on clinical presentations in resource poor countries. World Health Organization (WHO) has introduced "Faine's criteria" for diagnosis of leptospirosis. This study was conducted to evaluate the usefulness of modified Faine's criteria (with amendment) 2012 to detect leptospirosis in resource poor settings. Blood samples of 168 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria admitted between January 2013 to January 2014 were tested by a commercial immunochromatographic assay (Leptocheck WB, India), microscopic agglutination test (MAT) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods. Leptospirosis was confirmed by a single MAT titre ≥1:400 and / or by a positive PCR. Diagnosis of leptospirosis was made using the clinical, epidemiological and laboratory data according to modified Faine's criteria (with amendment) 2012. Leptospirosis was confirmed in 39 % (n = 66) by MAT and/or PCR. When modified Faine's criteria (MAT ≥ 1.400 &/ or PCR), was evaluated against LERG confirmed cases sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values were 95.45 %, 56.86 %, 58.88 %, 95.08 % respectively. The modified Faine's criteria with rapid immunochromatographic assay only had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value 89.39 %, 58.82 %, 58.42 %, and 89.55 % respectively. The modified Faine's criteria which utilized only immunochromatographic assay (leptocheck IgM) in Part C was found to be useful tool for diagnosing leptospirosis in a resource poor setting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 147 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 14%
Student > Postgraduate 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Other 9 6%
Lecturer 4 3%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 55 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 36%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 55 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,708,493
of 23,443,716 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,635
of 7,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,468
of 343,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#71
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,443,716 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.