You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cnidarian phylogenetic relationships as revealed by mitogenomics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-13-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ehsan Kayal, Béatrice Roure, Hervé Philippe, Allen G Collins, Dennis V Lavrov |
| Abstract |
Cnidaria (corals, sea anemones, hydroids, jellyfish) is a phylum of relatively simple aquatic animals characterized by the presence of the cnidocyst: a cell containing a giant capsular organelle with an eversible tubule (cnida). Species within Cnidaria have life cycles that involve one or both of the two distinct body forms, a typically benthic polyp, which may or may not be colonial, and a typically pelagic mostly solitary medusa. The currently accepted taxonomic scheme subdivides Cnidaria into two main assemblages: Anthozoa (Hexacorallia + Octocorallia) - cnidarians with a reproductive polyp and the absence of a medusa stage - and Medusozoa (Cubozoa, Hydrozoa, Scyphozoa, Staurozoa) - cnidarians that usually possess a reproductive medusa stage. Hypothesized relationships among these taxa greatly impact interpretations of cnidarian character evolution. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 366 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 2% |
| Germany | 5 | 1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 2% |
| Unknown | 335 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 80 | 22% |
| Researcher | 71 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 55 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 53 | 14% |
| Other | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 48 | 13% |
| Unknown | 45 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 192 | 52% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 58 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 30 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 14 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 4% |
| Unknown | 56 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,017,552
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#493
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,732
of 290,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#9
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.