You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Achieving integrated self-directed Cancer aftercare (ASICA) for melanoma: how a digital intervention to support total skin self-examination was used by people treated for cutaneous melanoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12885-021-08959-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Felicity Reilly, Lynda Contstable, William Brant, Kaz Rahman, Amer Durrani, Nigel Burrows, Charlotte Proby, Julia Allan, Marie Johnston, Derek Johnston, Fiona Walter, Peter Murchie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 30 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 28% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 8% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 30 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2021.
All research outputs
#14,555,398
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#3,450
of 8,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,823
of 431,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#57
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,441 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.