The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A combination of Bohr and Haldane effects provide a physiologic explanation for the increase in arterial oxygen saturation when a face mask is added to a high-flow nasal cannula in severely hypoxemic COVID-19 patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-021-03791-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pablo Born, Ricardo Castro |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 11 | 11% |
| Chile | 5 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 67 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 89 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 6% |
| Scientists | 4 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 44% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2021.
All research outputs
#714,634
of 26,052,823 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#476
of 6,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,828
of 418,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#12
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,052,823 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.