↓ Skip to main content

Treatment of Klebsiella Pneumoniae Carbapenemase (KPC) infections: a review of published case series and case reports

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 678)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
164 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
345 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment of Klebsiella Pneumoniae Carbapenemase (KPC) infections: a review of published case series and case reports
Published in
Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1476-0711-11-32
Pubmed ID
Authors

Grace C Lee, David S Burgess

Abstract

The emergence of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPCs) producing bacteria has become a significant global public health challenge while the optimal treatment remains undefined. We performed a systematic review of published studies and reports of treatment outcomes of KPC infections using MEDLINE (2001-2011). Articles or cases were excluded if one of the following was fulfilled: no individual patient data provided, no treatment regimen specified, no treatment outcome specified, report of colonization, or greater than three antibiotics were used to treat the KPC infection. Data extracted included patient demographics, site of infection, organism, KPC subtype, antimicrobial therapy directed at KPC-infection, and treatment outcome. Statistical analysis was performed in an exploratory manner. A total of 38 articles comprising 105 cases were included in the analysis. The majority of infections were due to K. pneumoniae (89%). The most common site of infection was blood (52%), followed by respiratory (30%), and urine (10%). Forty-nine (47%) cases received monotherapy and 56 (53%) cases received combination therapy directed at the KPC-infection. Significantly more treatment failures were seen in cases that received monotherapy compared to cases who received combination therapy (49% vs 25%; p= 0.01). Respiratory infections were associated with higher rates of treatment failure with monotherapy compared to combination therapy (67% vs 29% p= 0.03). Polymyxin monotherapy was associated with higher treatment failure rates compared to polymyxin-based combination therapy (73% vs 29%; p= 0.02); similarly, higher treatment failure rates were seen with carbapenem monotherapy compared to carbapenem-based combination therapy (60% vs 26%; p= 0.03). Overall treatment failure rates were not significantly different in the three most common antibiotic-class combinations: polymyxin plus carbapenem, polymyxin plus tigecycline, polymyxin plus aminoglycoside (30%, 29%, and 25% respectively; p=0.6). In conclusion, combination therapy is recommended for the treatment of KPC infections; however, which combination of antimicrobial agents needs to be established in future prospective clinical trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 345 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Nigeria 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 328 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 14%
Student > Bachelor 49 14%
Researcher 43 12%
Student > Postgraduate 40 12%
Other 29 8%
Other 81 23%
Unknown 54 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 132 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 36 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 4%
Other 20 6%
Unknown 70 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,053,474
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#34
of 678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,353
of 286,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them