You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interdisciplinary Comprehensive Arm Rehabilitation Evaluation (ICARE): a randomized controlled trial protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Neurology, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2377-13-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carolee J Winstein, Steven L Wolf, Alexander W Dromerick, Christianne J Lane, Monica A Nelsen, Rebecca Lewthwaite, Sarah Blanton, Charro Scott, Aimee Reiss, Steven Yong Cen, Rahsaan Holley, Stanley P Azen, For the ICARE Investigative Team |
| Abstract |
Residual disability after stroke is substantial; 65% of patients at 6 months are unable to incorporate the impaired upper extremity into daily activities. Task-oriented training programs are rapidly being adopted into clinical practice. In the absence of any consensus on the essential elements or dose of task-specific training, an urgent need exists for a well-designed trial to determine the effectiveness of a specific multidimensional task-based program governed by a comprehensive set of evidence-based principles. The Interdisciplinary Comprehensive Arm Rehabilitation Evaluation (ICARE) Stroke Initiative is a parallel group, three-arm, single blind, superiority randomized controlled trial of a theoretically-defensible, upper extremity rehabilitation program provided in the outpatient setting.The primary objective of ICARE is to determine if there is a greater improvement in arm and hand recovery one year after randomization in participants receiving a structured training program termed Accelerated Skill Acquisition Program (ASAP), compared to participants receiving usual and customary therapy of an equivalent dose (DEUCC). Two secondary objectives are to compare ASAP to a true (active monitoring only) usual and customary (UCC) therapy group and to compare DEUCC and UCC. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 242 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 38 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 13% |
| Researcher | 27 | 11% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 46 | 19% |
| Unknown | 54 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 54 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 21% |
| Neuroscience | 29 | 12% |
| Psychology | 10 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 13% |
| Unknown | 63 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2015.
All research outputs
#3,101,789
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#375
of 2,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,525
of 282,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#7
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.