You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The older prisoner health and social care assessment and plan (OHSCAP) versus treatment as usual: a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-021-11965-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katrina Forsyth, Roger T. Webb, Laura Archer Power, Richard Emsley, Jane Senior, Alistair Burns, David Challis, Adrian Hayes, Rachel Meacock, Elizabeth Walsh, Stuart Ware, Jenny Shaw |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 58% |
| Comoros | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 62% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 69% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2021.
All research outputs
#3,259,963
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,781
of 14,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,187
of 432,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#78
of 364 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 364 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.