You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Building implementation capacity in health care and welfare through team training—study protocol of a longitudinal mixed-methods evaluation of the building implementation capacity intervention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science Communications, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s43058-021-00233-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hanna Augustsson, Veronica-Aurelia Costea, Leif Eriksson, Henna Hasson, Annika Bäck, Mårten Åhström, Anna Bergström |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 2 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 65% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2021.
All research outputs
#6,174,666
of 22,901,818 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science Communications
#202
of 381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,321
of 503,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science Communications
#15
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,901,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.