↓ Skip to main content

Paradox of trimethylamine-N-oxide, the impact of malnutrition on microbiota-derived metabolites and septic patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Intensive Care, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Paradox of trimethylamine-N-oxide, the impact of malnutrition on microbiota-derived metabolites and septic patients
Published in
Journal of Intensive Care, October 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40560-021-00581-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruey-Hsing Chou, Po-Shan Wu, Shen-Chih Wang, Cheng-Hsueh Wu, Shu-Fen Lu, Ru-Yu Lien, Yi-Lin Tsai, Ya-Wen Lu, Ming-Ren Kuo, Jiun-Yu Guo, Ruey-Yi Chou, Po-Hsun Huang, Shing-Jong Lin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 16%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Unknown 14 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 16%
Engineering 3 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Mathematics 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2021.
All research outputs
#5,896,555
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#236
of 521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,599
of 439,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 521 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.