You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Transparency of peer review: a semi-structured interview study with chief editors from social sciences and humanities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Integrity and Peer Review, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41073-021-00116-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Veli-Matti Karhulahti, Hans-Joachim Backe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 11% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Poland | 1 | 6% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 6% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Austria | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 56% |
| Scientists | 5 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 20% |
| Librarian | 1 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 20% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,598,992
of 24,980,180 outputs
Outputs from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#69
of 130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,207
of 515,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,980,180 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 73.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.