RT @MKarhulahti: @Hiro_IMADA We did a qual study on this topic with journal chief editors and they identified seven downsides https://t.co…
1,063 followers
413 followers
@Hiro_IMADA We did a qual study on this topic with journal chief editors and they identified seven downsides https://t.co/CohWN3wNXh https://t.co/TSYtGtIY4x
34,909 followers
But in social science and humanities, research suggest editors think "anonymized review was also perceived as ethically superior due to the protection it provides, and more pragmatic due to eased seeking of reviewers" https://t.co/4wScrZwe6P 3/3
1,366 followers
Interesting. When I edited the International Social Science Journal (2002-2015), I used double-blind peer review, and always found it uncomfortable when authors demanded referees' names - which occasionally happened when a "big name" got negative comments.