You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Acceptability and appropriateness of a clinical pathway for managing anxiety and depression in cancer patients: a mixed methods study of staff perspectives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12913-021-07252-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Phyllis Butow, Heather L. Shepherd, Jessica Cuddy, Marnie Harris, Sharon He, Lindy Masya, Mona Faris, Nicole M. Rankin, Philip Beale, Afaf Girgis, Brian Kelly, Peter Grimison, Joanne Shaw |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 50% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 17% |
| Psychology | 3 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2021.
All research outputs
#6,576,837
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,169
of 7,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,392
of 510,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#78
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 510,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.