You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rebuilding community resilience in a post-war context: developing insight and recommendations - a qualitative study in Northern Sri Lanka
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1752-4458-7-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daya Somasundaram, Sambasivamoorthy Sivayokan |
| Abstract |
Individuals, families and communities in Northern Sri Lanka have undergone three decades of war trauma, multiple displacements, and loss of family, kin, friends, homes, employment and other valued resources. The objective of the study was understanding common psychosocial problems faced by families and communities, and the associated risk and protective factors, so that practical and effective community based interventions can be recommended to rebuild strengths, adaptation, coping strategies and resilience. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
| India | 3 | 14% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 10% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 81% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 698 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 689 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 103 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 97 | 14% |
| Researcher | 82 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 65 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 58 | 8% |
| Other | 108 | 15% |
| Unknown | 185 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 163 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 124 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 19 | 3% |
| Other | 71 | 10% |
| Unknown | 205 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2017.
All research outputs
#1,171,304
of 24,862,067 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#34
of 748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,115
of 294,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,862,067 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 748 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.