↓ Skip to main content

Anemia in relation to body mass index and waist circumference among chinese women

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anemia in relation to body mass index and waist circumference among chinese women
Published in
Nutrition Journal, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-12-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu Qin, Alida Melse-Boonstra, Xiaoqun Pan, Baojun Yuan, Yue Dai, Jinkou Zhao, Michael B Zimmermann, Frans J Kok, Minghao Zhou, Zumin Shi

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the relationship of anemia and body mass index among adult women in Jiangsu Province, China. Data were collected in a sub-national cross-sectional survey, and 1,537 women aged 20 years and above were included in the analyses. Subjects were classified by body mass index (BMI) categories as underweight, normal weight, overweight and obese according to the Chinese standard. Central obesity was defined as a waist circumference ≥ 80 cm. Anemia was defined as hemoglobin concentration <  12 g/dl. Prevalence ratios (PRs) of the relationship between anemia and BMI or waist circumference were calculated using Poisson regression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 2 1%
Unknown 178 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 19%
Student > Master 21 12%
Researcher 16 9%
Other 10 6%
Lecturer 8 4%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 62 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 65 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2013.
All research outputs
#18,326,065
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#1,262
of 1,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,272
of 282,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#34
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.