You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Barriers and facilitators to adherence to national drug policies on antibiotic prescribing and dispensing in Bangladesh
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40545-021-00342-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fosiul Alam Nizame, Dewan Muhammad Shoaib, Emily K. Rousham, Salma Akter, Mohammad Aminul Islam, Afsana Alamgir Khan, Mahbubur Rahman, Leanne Unicomb |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 31 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 6 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 30 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2021.
All research outputs
#16,300,483
of 24,024,220 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
#319
of 442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,427
of 386,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
#14
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,024,220 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.