You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Maternal feeding practices and toddlers’ fruit and vegetable consumption: results from the DIT-Coombe Hospital birth cohort in Ireland
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-021-00743-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiyao Liu, Qianling Zhou, Keara Clarke, Katherine M. Younger, Meijing An, Zhouyinuo Li, Yang Tan, John M. Kearney |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Rwanda | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 25 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2022.
All research outputs
#8,111,458
of 24,620,113 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#962
of 1,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,631
of 432,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#11
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,620,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.1. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.