↓ Skip to main content

The cost-utility of early use of high-flow nasal cannula in bronchiolitis

Overview of attention for article published in Health Economics Review, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The cost-utility of early use of high-flow nasal cannula in bronchiolitis
Published in
Health Economics Review, October 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13561-021-00339-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jefferson Antonio Buendía, Ranniery Acuña-Cordero, Carlos E. Rodriguez-Martinez

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Master 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 13 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 21%
Unspecified 1 4%
Unknown 13 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2023.
All research outputs
#14,288,171
of 23,656,895 outputs
Outputs from Health Economics Review
#191
of 450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,924
of 441,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Economics Review
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,656,895 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.