↓ Skip to main content

Implication and challenges of direct-fed microbial supplementation to improve ruminant production and health

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implication and challenges of direct-fed microbial supplementation to improve ruminant production and health
Published in
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, October 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40104-021-00630-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yajing Ban, Le Luo Guan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Master 7 9%
Researcher 5 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 40 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 26%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 42 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2021.
All research outputs
#20,669,432
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#657
of 906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#329,073
of 437,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#16
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 906 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.